[QOL 3] A Universal Time vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 6,078 concurrent players against 2,323, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 6,365 concurrent players, versus 2,323. Lifetime, [QOL 3] A Universal Time has more visits (988.6M vs 313.8M). Full side-by-side history for [QOL 3] A Universal Time and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
[QOL 3] A Universal Time
2,323
playing now
2,323 24h peak · 988.6M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
6,078
playing now
6,365 24h peak · 313.8M visits
Player count history
[QOL 3] A Universal TimeFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | [QOL 3] A Universal Time | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,323 | 6,078 | 3,755 (2.6×) |
| 24h peak | 2,323 | 6,365 | 4,042 (2.7×) |
| 24h average | 1,874 | 5,080 | 3,206 (2.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,323 | 6,365 | 4,042 (2.7×) |
| 7-day average | 1,574 | 4,414 | 2,840 (2.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,323 | 6,365 | 4,042 (2.7×) |
| All-time peak | 2,323 | 6,365 | 4,042 (2.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 14.1% | ▲ 27.0% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 988.6M | 313.8M | 674.8M (3.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 91.6K | 585.1K | 493.4K (6.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 347.1K | 2.4M | 2M (6.8×) |
| Favorites | 1.4M | 838.4K | 576.1K (1.7×) |
| Rating | 86.1% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #715 | #260 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 61.5 | 55.6 | — |
| Created | Jun 3, 2020 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | RPG | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [QOL 3] A Universal Time, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.