Spider vs Build to Survive

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,388 concurrent players against 4,426. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 6,428. Lifetime, Spider has more visits (3B vs 405M). Full side-by-side history for Spider and Build to Survive is charted above.

Spider
4,426
playing now
6,022 24h peak Β· 3B visits
VS
Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,388
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits

Player count history

SpiderBuild to Survive

Head to head

Metric Spider Build to SurviveDifference
Playing now4,4265,388962
24h peak6,0226,607585
24h average4,7845,200416
7-day peak6,4286,744316
7-day average4,4485,226778
30-day peak6,4286,744316
All-time peak6,4286,744316
24h changeβ–² 36.3%β–Ό 0.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits3B405M2.6B (7.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)746.9K494.4K252.5K (1.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.9M1.3M610.4K
Favorites3M10.9M7.9M (3.7Γ—)
Rating74.5%96.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#393#307of 4,381
Trending score27.6-1.8β€”
CreatedMay 31, 2020Feb 12, 2021β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Spider, 4 for Build to Survive.

Spider vs Build to Survive β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals