Spider vs Eat the World

Spider currently leads with 5,075 concurrent players against 2,968, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Spider at 6,428 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Spider has more visits (3B vs 615.4M). Full side-by-side history for Spider and Eat the World is charted above.

Spider
5,075
playing now
6,022 24h peak · 3B visits
VS
Eat the World
2,968
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.4M visits

Player count history

SpiderEat the World

Head to head

Metric Spider Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now5,0752,9682,107 (1.7×)
24h peak6,0224,7471,275
24h average4,9813,7831,198
7-day peak6,4285,2401,188
7-day average4,4833,786697
30-day peak6,4285,2401,188
All-time peak6,4285,2611,167
24h change 27.3% 2.6%
7d change
Total visits3B615.4M2.4B (4.8×)
Visits (24h)731.9K403.6K328.2K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)1.7M1.3M422.1K
Favorites3M27.8M24.8M (9.4×)
Rating74.5%94.7%
Global rank (players)#287#548of 4,278
Trending score40.9-0.3
CreatedMay 31, 2020Feb 22, 2024
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Spider, 4 for Eat the World.

Spider vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals