Field Trip Z vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB
Field Trip Z currently leads with 3,074 concurrent players against 790, a 3.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Field Trip Z at 4,117 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours Field Trip Z: -2.9% week over week versus -16.9% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, Field Trip Z has more visits (1.3B vs 7.2M). Full side-by-side history for Field Trip Z and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.
Field Trip Z
3,074
playing now
4,117 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
790
playing now
1,660 24h peak · 7.2M visits
Player count history
Field Trip ZFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB
Head to head
| Metric | Field Trip Z | FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,074 | 790 | 2,284 (3.9×) |
| 24h peak | 4,117 | 1,660 | 2,457 (2.5×) |
| 24h average | 3,216 | 1,087 | 2,129 (3.0×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,117 | 1,660 | 2,457 (2.5×) |
| 7-day average | 2,138 | 1,053 | 1,085 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,117 | 1,660 | 2,457 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 4,117 | 1,769 | 2,348 (2.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 45.0% | ▲ 2.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 2.9% | ▼ 16.9% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 7.2M | 1.3B (176.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 459.9K | 180.1K | 279.8K (2.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.1M | 1.1M | 955.8K (1.8×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 781.9K | 1M (2.3×) |
| Rating | 77.8% | 81.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #528 | #1,637 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 174.9 | 9.6 | — |
| Created | Apr 28, 2020 | Apr 24, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Field Trip Z, 9 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.