Field Trip Z vs +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
Field Trip Z currently leads with 1,526 concurrent players against 361, a 4.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! at 4,967 concurrent players, versus 4,117. Momentum favours Field Trip Z: -0.8% week over week versus -71.0% for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!. Lifetime, Field Trip Z has more visits (1.3B vs 6.6M). Full side-by-side history for Field Trip Z and +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! is charted above.
Field Trip Z
1,526
playing now
3,164 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
361
playing now
601 24h peak · 6.6M visits
Player count history
Field Trip Z+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
Head to head
| Metric | Field Trip Z | +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,526 | 361 | 1,165 (4.2×) |
| 24h peak | 3,164 | 601 | 2,563 (5.3×) |
| 24h average | 2,172 | 418 | 1,754 (5.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,935 | 1,532 | 2,403 (2.6×) |
| 7-day average | 2,140 | 641 | 1,499 (3.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,935 | 3,759 | 176 |
| All-time peak | 4,117 | 4,967 | 850 |
| 24h change | ▼ 30.6% | ▲ 45.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 0.8% | ▼ 71.0% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 6.6M | 1.3B (191.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 341.9K | 56.8K | 285.1K (6.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.2M | 592.7K | 1.6M (3.7×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 536K | 1.3M (3.4×) |
| Rating | 77.8% | 89.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #754 | #2,074 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 4.9 | -88.1 | — |
| Created | Apr 28, 2020 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Field Trip Z, 12 for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!.