Field Trip Z vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,124 concurrent players against 2,995. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 3,193. Lifetime, Field Trip Z has more visits (1.3B vs 264.5M). Full side-by-side history for Field Trip Z and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Field Trip Z
2,995
playing now
2,958 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,124
playing now
6,072 24h peak · 264.5M visits
Player count history
Field Trip ZBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Field Trip Z | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,995 | 4,124 | 1,129 |
| 24h peak | 2,958 | 6,072 | 3,114 (2.1×) |
| 24h average | 2,515 | 4,798 | 2,283 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,095 | 6,072 | 2,977 (2.0×) |
| 7-day average | 2,270 | 4,471 | 2,201 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,095 | 6,072 | 2,977 (2.0×) |
| All-time peak | 3,193 | 6,072 | 2,879 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 22.1% | ▲ 15.3% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 264.5M | 1B (4.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 304.6K | 409.1K | 104.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 982.3K | 967.9K | 14.4K |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 5.5M | 3.7M (3.1×) |
| Rating | 77.8% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #536 | #383 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | 36.3 | 26.8 | — |
| Created | Apr 28, 2020 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Field Trip Z, 3 for Build to Survive [TESTING].