Field Trip Z vs Eat the World
Eat the World currently leads with 3,094 concurrent players against 2,955. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 4,117. Momentum favours Field Trip Z: +2.3% week over week versus -15.7% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Field Trip Z has more visits (1.3B vs 618.5M). Full side-by-side history for Field Trip Z and Eat the World is charted above.
Field Trip Z
2,955
playing now
3,742 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Eat the World
3,094
playing now
3,880 24h peak · 618.5M visits
Player count history
Field Trip ZEat the World
Head to head
| Metric | Field Trip Z | Eat the World | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,955 | 3,094 | 139 |
| 24h peak | 3,742 | 3,880 | 138 |
| 24h average | 2,875 | 3,321 | 446 |
| 7-day peak | 3,935 | 4,101 | 166 |
| 7-day average | 2,219 | 3,271 | 1,052 |
| 30-day peak | 3,935 | 4,294 | 359 |
| All-time peak | 4,117 | 5,261 | 1,144 |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.8% | ▲ 5.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 2.3% | ▼ 15.7% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 618.5M | 650.4M (2.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 379.6K | 324.2K | 55.3K |
| Visits (7d) | 2.2M | 2.3M | 96.1K |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 27.9M | 26.1M (15.4×) |
| Rating | 77.8% | 94.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #689 | #675 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 101.2 | 5.3 | — |
| Created | Apr 28, 2020 | Feb 22, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Field Trip Z, 13 for Eat the World.