Ragdoll Simulator vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 1,969 concurrent players against 359, a 5.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,854 concurrent players, versus 1,276. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +182.3% week over week versus -49.3% for Ragdoll Simulator. Lifetime, Ragdoll Simulator has more visits (297M vs 4.5M). Full side-by-side history for Ragdoll Simulator and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
🎈 Ragdoll Simulator
359
playing now
475 24h peak · 297M visits
VS
[👑] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,969
playing now
2,635 24h peak · 4.5M visits
Player count history
Ragdoll SimulatorTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | Ragdoll Simulator | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 359 | 1,969 | 1,610 (5.5×) |
| 24h peak | 475 | 2,635 | 2,160 (5.5×) |
| 24h average | 369 | 2,169 | 1,800 (5.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 607 | 2,734 | 2,127 (4.5×) |
| 7-day average | 425 | 1,900 | 1,475 (4.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,276 | 2,734 | 1,458 (2.1×) |
| All-time peak | 1,276 | 2,854 | 1,578 (2.2×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 13.4% | ▼ 6.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 49.3% | ▲ 182.3% | — |
| Total visits | 297M | 4.5M | 292.5M (66.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 54.9K | 429.2K | 374.3K (7.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 423.1K | 3M | 2.5M (7.0×) |
| Favorites | 706.4K | 28.6K | 677.9K (24.7×) |
| Rating | 79.3% | 92.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,396 | #881 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | -32.1 | 46.6 | — |
| Created | Apr 27, 2020 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Ragdoll Simulator, 12 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].