Tower Battles vs CQB Hell

CQB Hell currently leads with 728 concurrent players against 384, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to CQB Hell at 1,196 concurrent players, versus 621. Momentum favours CQB Hell: +34.8% week over week versus +0.6% for Tower Battles. Lifetime, Tower Battles has more visits (649.8M vs 12.2M). Full side-by-side history for Tower Battles and CQB Hell is charted above.

Tower Battles
384
playing now
621 24h peak · 649.8M visits
VS
CQB Hell
728
playing now
1,061 24h peak · 12.2M visits

Player count history

Tower BattlesCQB Hell

Head to head

Metric Tower Battles CQB HellDifference
Playing now384728344 (1.9×)
24h peak6211,061440 (1.7×)
24h average386848462 (2.2×)
7-day peak6211,188567 (1.9×)
7-day average349756407 (2.2×)
30-day peak6211,188567 (1.9×)
All-time peak6211,196575 (1.9×)
24h change 9.0% 2.8%
7d change 0.6% 34.8%
Total visits649.8M12.2M637.6M (53.1×)
Visits (24h)47.8K110.8K63.1K (2.3×)
Visits (7d)322.5K710.5K388K (2.2×)
Favorites1.1M55.4K1.1M (20.0×)
Rating91.3%71.6%
Global rank (players)#2,262#1,635of 8,283
Trending score25.734.6
CreatedJan 28, 2011Mar 14, 2025
GenreStrategyShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Tower Battles, 9 for CQB Hell.