Banana Eats vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,247 concurrent players against 2,781, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,508. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +4.5% week over week versus -5.1% for Banana Eats. Lifetime, Banana Eats has more visits (836.7M vs 268.9M). Full side-by-side history for Banana Eats and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
[🥞] Banana Eats
2,781
playing now
3,811 24h peak · 836.7M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,247
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
Player count history
Banana EatsBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Banana Eats | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,781 | 4,247 | 1,466 (1.5×) |
| 24h peak | 3,811 | 6,794 | 2,983 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 2,693 | 5,092 | 2,399 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,811 | 6,794 | 2,983 (1.8×) |
| 7-day average | 2,445 | 4,979 | 2,534 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,811 | 6,794 | 2,983 (1.8×) |
| All-time peak | 4,508 | 7,729 | 3,221 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 12.8% | ▲ 3.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.1% | ▲ 4.5% | — |
| Total visits | 836.7M | 268.9M | 567.9M (3.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 265.1K | 463K | 197.9K (1.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.9M | 3.2M | 1.3M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 5.6M | 3.6M (2.8×) |
| Rating | 88.7% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #575 | #353 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 34.5 | 8.4 | — |
| Created | Nov 22, 2019 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Banana Eats, 12 for Build to Survive [TESTING].