Combat Warriors vs Ball Eating Simulator

Combat Warriors currently leads with 3,027 concurrent players against 329, a 9.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Combat Warriors at 3,027 concurrent players, versus 403. Lifetime, Combat Warriors has more visits (1.4B vs 116.1M). Full side-by-side history for Combat Warriors and Ball Eating Simulator is charted above.

Combat Warriors
3,027
playing now
3,011 24h peak · 1.4B visits
VS
Ball Eating Simulator
329
playing now
389 24h peak · 116.1M visits

Player count history

Combat WarriorsBall Eating Simulator

Head to head

Metric Combat Warriors Ball Eating SimulatorDifference
Playing now3,0273292,698 (9.2×)
24h peak3,0113892,622 (7.7×)
24h average2,6123132,299 (8.3×)
7-day peak3,0113892,622 (7.7×)
7-day average2,4232612,162 (9.3×)
30-day peak3,0113892,622 (7.7×)
All-time peak3,0274032,624 (7.5×)
24h change 21.7% 28.8%
7d change
Total visits1.4B116.1M1.3B (12.4×)
Visits (24h)222K52.5K169.5K (4.2×)
Visits (7d)741.3K165.5K575.8K (4.5×)
Favorites2.4M6.7M4.4M (2.9×)
Rating83.5%91.8%
Global rank (players)#581#2,112of 4,381
Trending score26.445.6
CreatedNov 3, 2019Nov 14, 2023
GenreActionSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Combat Warriors, 5 for Ball Eating Simulator.

Combat Warriors vs Ball Eating Simulator — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals