Combat Warriors vs [2x] +1 Fat Per Click
[2x] +1 Fat Per Click currently leads with 5,102 concurrent players against 3,168, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [2x] +1 Fat Per Click at 8,085 concurrent players, versus 3,168. Lifetime, Combat Warriors has more visits (1.4B vs 20.2M). Full side-by-side history for Combat Warriors and [2x] +1 Fat Per Click is charted above.
Combat Warriors
3,168
playing now
3,168 24h peak · 1.4B visits
VS
[2x] +1 Fat Per Click
5,102
playing now
6,289 24h peak · 20.2M visits
Player count history
Combat Warriors[2x] +1 Fat Per Click
Head to head
| Metric | Combat Warriors | [2x] +1 Fat Per Click | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,168 | 5,102 | 1,934 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 3,168 | 6,289 | 3,121 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 2,831 | 4,386 | 1,555 (1.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,168 | 7,961 | 4,793 (2.5×) |
| 7-day average | 2,449 | 4,291 | 1,842 (1.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,168 | 7,961 | 4,793 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 3,168 | 8,085 | 4,917 (2.6×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 17.4% | ▲ 21.5% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 1.4B | 20.2M | 1.4B (71.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 237.3K | 334.4K | 97K |
| Visits (7d) | 923.7K | 1.4M | 518.2K (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 2.4M | 25.6K | 2.3M (92.5×) |
| Rating | 83.5% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #618 | #384 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 53.3 | 8.0 | — |
| Created | Nov 3, 2019 | Jun 14, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Action | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Combat Warriors, 5 for [2x] +1 Fat Per Click.