[x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB
FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 1,567 concurrent players against 536, a 2.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 1,687. Momentum favours [x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA: -5.0% week over week versus -15.8% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, [x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA has more visits (121.6M vs 7.1M). Full side-by-side history for [x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.
[x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA⚡
536
playing now
584 24h peak · 121.6M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
1,567
playing now
1,660 24h peak · 7.1M visits
Player count history
[x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJAFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB
Head to head
| Metric | [x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA | FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 536 | 1,567 | 1,031 (2.9×) |
| 24h peak | 584 | 1,660 | 1,076 (2.8×) |
| 24h average | 530 | 1,324 | 794 (2.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,662 | 1,660 | 2 |
| 7-day average | 949 | 1,112 | 163 |
| 30-day peak | 1,662 | 1,660 | 2 |
| All-time peak | 1,687 | 1,769 | 82 |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.7% | ▲ 19.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.0% | ▼ 15.8% | — |
| Total visits | 121.6M | 7.1M | 114.5M (17.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 33K | 161.3K | 128.3K (4.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 425.3K | 1.1M | 696.4K (2.6×) |
| Favorites | 336.3K | 776.3K | 440K (2.3×) |
| Rating | 75.9% | 81.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,314 | #1,235 | of 7,783 |
| Trending score | -117.5 | 58.3 | — |
| Created | Oct 27, 2019 | Apr 24, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for [x2 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA, 9 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.