[x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA vs [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape currently leads with 3,741 concurrent players against 521, a 7.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape at 4,156 concurrent players, versus 1,687. Momentum favours [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape: +8.1% week over week versus -14.1% for [x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA. Lifetime, [x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA has more visits (121.6M vs 43.3M). Full side-by-side history for [x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA and [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape is charted above.
[x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA⚡
521
playing now
584 24h peak · 121.6M visits
VS
[2X🍗] Get Fat to Break Tape 🍗
3,741
playing now
4,156 24h peak · 43.3M visits
Player count history
[x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
Head to head
| Metric | [x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA | [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 521 | 3,741 | 3,220 (7.2×) |
| 24h peak | 584 | 4,156 | 3,572 (7.1×) |
| 24h average | 501 | 3,544 | 3,043 (7.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,662 | 4,156 | 2,494 (2.5×) |
| 7-day average | 894 | 2,397 | 1,503 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,662 | 4,156 | 2,494 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 1,687 | 4,156 | 2,469 (2.5×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 7.4% | ▲ 54.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 14.1% | ▲ 8.1% | — |
| Total visits | 121.6M | 43.3M | 78.3M (2.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 33.1K | 406K | 372.9K (12.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 406.3K | 1.9M | 1.5M (4.8×) |
| Favorites | 336.4K | 2.4M | 2M (7.1×) |
| Rating | 75.9% | 98.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,047 | #462 | of 7,978 |
| Trending score | -115.8 | 168.2 | — |
| Created | Oct 27, 2019 | May 8, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for [x3 EVENT] +1 OP NINJA, 13 for [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape.