Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs Train Eater 2023
Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator currently leads with 388 concurrent players against 329. On all-time peak the record belongs to Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator at 527 concurrent players, versus 369. Lifetime, Train Eater 2023 has more visits (73.2M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator and Train Eater 2023 is charted above.
Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator
388
playing now
451 24h peak · 7.4M visits
VS
Train Eater 2023
329
playing now
366 24h peak · 73.2M visits
Player count history
Avionics | Plane Crash SimulatorTrain Eater 2023
Head to head
| Metric | Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator | Train Eater 2023 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 388 | 329 | 59 |
| 24h peak | 451 | 366 | 85 |
| 24h average | 348 | 285 | 63 |
| 7-day peak | 527 | 366 | 161 |
| 7-day average | 326 | 255 | 71 |
| 30-day peak | 527 | 366 | 161 |
| All-time peak | 527 | 369 | 158 |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.2% | ▲ 14.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 3.0% | — | — |
| Total visits | 7.4M | 73.2M | 65.8M (9.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 59.3K | 43.3K | 16K |
| Visits (7d) | 434.2K | 95.2K | 339.1K (4.6×) |
| Favorites | 18.1K | 54K | 35.9K (3.0×) |
| Rating | 68.0% | 63.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,286 | #2,469 | of 7,707 |
| Trending score | 16.0 | 26.5 | — |
| Created | May 17, 2016 | Apr 23, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs Soccer Manager TycoonAvionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs Find The Floppa Morphs (855)Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs +1 Speed Snail EscapeAvionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs Tongue BattlesAvionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs Cultist [HORROR]Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator vs Bid Battles!Compare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Avionics | Plane Crash Simulator, 4 for Train Eater 2023.