Ninja Legends vs Animal Simulator

Animal Simulator currently leads with 3,191 concurrent players against 997, a 3.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Animal Simulator at 5,531 concurrent players, versus 1,643. Momentum favours Ninja Legends: +3.7% week over week versus +1.3% for Animal Simulator. Lifetime, Ninja Legends has more visits (2.2B vs 1.6B). Full side-by-side history for Ninja Legends and Animal Simulator is charted above.

⚡Ninja Legends
997
playing now
1,607 24h peak · 2.2B visits
VS
Animal Simulator
3,191
playing now
5,008 24h peak · 1.6B visits

Player count history

Ninja LegendsAnimal Simulator

Head to head

Metric Ninja Legends Animal SimulatorDifference
Playing now9973,1912,194 (3.2×)
24h peak1,6075,0083,401 (3.1×)
24h average1,2393,7462,507 (3.0×)
7-day peak1,6075,0083,401 (3.1×)
7-day average1,1813,7682,587 (3.2×)
30-day peak1,6075,0083,401 (3.1×)
All-time peak1,6435,5313,888 (3.4×)
24h change 0.7% 1.5%
7d change 3.7% 1.3%
Total visits2.2B1.6B585.4M
Visits (24h)117.3K320.8K203.6K (2.7×)
Visits (7d)763K2.2M1.5M (2.9×)
Favorites4.7M1.8M2.9M (2.6×)
Rating92.5%83.6%
Global rank (players)#1,297#474of 8,339
Trending score14.9-2.1
CreatedSep 22, 2019Sep 20, 2020
GenreSimulationRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Ninja Legends, 14 for Animal Simulator.