Ninja Legends vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 2,682 concurrent players against 814, a 3.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 1,643. Momentum favours Ninja Legends: +3.4% week over week versus -15.3% for FNAF: Eternal Nights. Lifetime, Ninja Legends has more visits (2.2B vs 318.4M). Full side-by-side history for Ninja Legends and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
⚡Ninja Legends
814
playing now
1,607 24h peak · 2.2B visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
2,682
playing now
6,106 24h peak · 318.4M visits
Player count history
Ninja LegendsFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Ninja Legends | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 814 | 2,682 | 1,868 (3.3×) |
| 24h peak | 1,607 | 6,106 | 4,499 (3.8×) |
| 24h average | 1,188 | 3,650 | 2,462 (3.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,607 | 6,106 | 4,499 (3.8×) |
| 7-day average | 1,176 | 3,699 | 2,523 (3.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,607 | 6,106 | 4,499 (3.8×) |
| All-time peak | 1,643 | 7,002 | 5,359 (4.3×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.4% | ▼ 10.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 3.4% | ▼ 15.3% | — |
| Total visits | 2.2B | 318.4M | 1.8B (6.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 114.3K | 522.5K | 408.2K (4.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 763.9K | 3.7M | 3M (4.9×) |
| Favorites | 4.7M | 850.2K | 3.9M (5.5×) |
| Rating | 92.5% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,262 | #460 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 3.1 | -4.7 | — |
| Created | Sep 22, 2019 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Ninja Legends, 14 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.