Ninja Legends vs CQB Hell
Ninja Legends currently leads with 972 concurrent players against 799. On all-time peak the record belongs to Ninja Legends at 1,643 concurrent players, versus 1,196. Momentum favours CQB Hell: +35.4% week over week versus +3.7% for Ninja Legends. Lifetime, Ninja Legends has more visits (2.2B vs 12.2M). Full side-by-side history for Ninja Legends and CQB Hell is charted above.
⚡Ninja Legends
972
playing now
1,607 24h peak · 2.2B visits
VS
CQB Hell
799
playing now
1,061 24h peak · 12.2M visits
Player count history
Ninja LegendsCQB Hell
Head to head
| Metric | Ninja Legends | CQB Hell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 972 | 799 | 173 |
| 24h peak | 1,607 | 1,061 | 546 (1.5×) |
| 24h average | 1,231 | 841 | 390 |
| 7-day peak | 1,607 | 1,188 | 419 |
| 7-day average | 1,180 | 758 | 422 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,607 | 1,188 | 419 |
| All-time peak | 1,643 | 1,196 | 447 |
| 24h change | ▼ 0.5% | ▲ 1.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 3.7% | ▲ 35.4% | — |
| Total visits | 2.2B | 12.2M | 2.1B (176.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 116.6K | 110.8K | 5.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 763.7K | 714.2K | 49.5K |
| Favorites | 4.7M | 55.5K | 4.7M (85.0×) |
| Rating | 92.5% | 71.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,256 | #1,426 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 13.1 | 31.1 | — |
| Created | Sep 22, 2019 | Mar 14, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Ninja Legends, 10 for CQB Hell.