CITY DESTRUCTION vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 1,465 concurrent players against 387, a 3.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,854 concurrent players, versus 957. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +172.3% week over week versus -14.7% for CITY DESTRUCTION. Lifetime, CITY DESTRUCTION has more visits (51M vs 4.5M). Full side-by-side history for CITY DESTRUCTION and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
💥CITY DESTRUCTION💥
387
playing now
715 24h peak · 51M visits
VS
[👑] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,465
playing now
2,635 24h peak · 4.5M visits
Player count history
CITY DESTRUCTIONTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | CITY DESTRUCTION | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 387 | 1,465 | 1,078 (3.8×) |
| 24h peak | 715 | 2,635 | 1,920 (3.7×) |
| 24h average | 475 | 1,959 | 1,484 (4.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 740 | 2,734 | 1,994 (3.7×) |
| 7-day average | 495 | 1,876 | 1,381 (3.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 802 | 2,734 | 1,932 (3.4×) |
| All-time peak | 957 | 2,854 | 1,897 (3.0×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 8.7% | ▼ 15.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 14.7% | ▲ 172.3% | — |
| Total visits | 51M | 4.5M | 46.5M (11.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 71.4K | 425.9K | 354.5K (6.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 528.1K | 3M | 2.4M (5.6×) |
| Favorites | 73.9K | 28.9K | 45K (2.6×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 92.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,219 | #955 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | -10.3 | 14.4 | — |
| Created | Feb 29, 2016 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for CITY DESTRUCTION, 13 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].