[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED vs Build to Defend Loot
[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED currently leads with 4,178 concurrent players against 1,567, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Defend Loot at 7,220 concurrent players, versus 6,225. Momentum favours Build to Defend Loot: +6.6% week over week versus -10.2% for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED. Lifetime, [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED has more visits (296.6M vs 112.4M). Full side-by-side history for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.
[🛡️FACTIONS🛡️] ENTRENCHED 🥀
4,178
playing now
5,474 24h peak · 296.6M visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
1,567
playing now
7,220 24h peak · 112.4M visits
Player count history
[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHEDBuild to Defend Loot
Head to head
| Metric | [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED | Build to Defend Loot | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,178 | 1,567 | 2,611 (2.7×) |
| 24h peak | 5,474 | 7,220 | 1,746 |
| 24h average | 4,404 | 2,343 | 2,061 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 5,474 | 7,220 | 1,746 |
| 7-day average | 4,257 | 2,097 | 2,160 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,225 | 7,220 | 995 |
| All-time peak | 6,225 | 7,220 | 995 |
| 24h change | ▲ 2.1% | ▲ 14.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 10.2% | ▲ 6.6% | — |
| Total visits | 296.6M | 112.4M | 184.2M (2.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 403.3K | 321.1K | 82.2K |
| Visits (7d) | 3M | 2M | 954.3K |
| Favorites | 2.4M | 97.5K | 2.3M (24.6×) |
| Rating | 92.2% | 87.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #383 | #999 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 12.5 | 39.1 | — |
| Created | Aug 18, 2019 | Jan 3, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED, 12 for Build to Defend Loot.