[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED vs Borders RTS [v2.0]

[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED currently leads with 3,695 concurrent players against 89, a 41.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED at 6,225 concurrent players, versus 3,574. Momentum favours Borders RTS [v2.0]: +356.0% week over week versus -10.4% for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED. Lifetime, [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED has more visits (296.4M vs 11M). Full side-by-side history for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED and Borders RTS [v2.0] is charted above.

[🛡️FACTIONS🛡️] ENTRENCHED 🥀
3,695
playing now
5,099 24h peak · 296.4M visits
VS
Borders RTS [v2.0]
89
playing now
180 24h peak · 11M visits

Player count history

[FACTIONS] ENTRENCHEDBorders RTS [v2.0]

Head to head

Metric [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED Borders RTS [v2.0]Difference
Playing now3,695893,606 (41.5×)
24h peak5,0991804,919 (28.3×)
24h average4,1001123,988 (36.6×)
7-day peak5,9543,4942,460 (1.7×)
7-day average4,2237253,498 (5.8×)
30-day peak6,2253,4942,731 (1.8×)
All-time peak6,2253,5742,651 (1.7×)
24h change 4.8% 9.7%
7d change 10.4% 356.0%
Total visits296.4M11M285.5M (27.0×)
Visits (24h)408.5K12.6K395.9K (32.3×)
Visits (7d)3M1.2M1.8M (2.6×)
Favorites2.4M55.4K2.3M (43.3×)
Rating92.2%70.3%
Global rank (players)#484#3,854of 8,009
Trending score-10.5-170.5
CreatedAug 18, 2019Jan 26, 2026
GenreShooterStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [FACTIONS] ENTRENCHED, 13 for Borders RTS [v2.0].