Muscle Legends vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Muscle Legends currently leads with 12,740 concurrent players against 6,589, a 1.9Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Muscle Legends at 13,027 concurrent players, versus 6,684. Lifetime, Muscle Legends has more visits (2.3B vs 264.8M). Full side-by-side history for Muscle Legends and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
πͺMuscle Legends
12,740
playing now
13,027 24h peak Β· 2.3B visits
VS
Build to Survive π οΈ [TESTING]
6,589
playing now
6,684 24h peak Β· 264.8M visits
Player count history
Muscle LegendsBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Muscle Legends | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 12,740 | 6,589 | 6,151 (1.9Γ) |
| 24h peak | 13,027 | 6,684 | 6,343 (1.9Γ) |
| 24h average | 11,075 | 5,317 | 5,758 (2.1Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 13,027 | 6,684 | 6,343 (1.9Γ) |
| 7-day average | 9,897 | 4,614 | 5,283 (2.1Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 13,027 | 6,684 | 6,343 (1.9Γ) |
| All-time peak | 13,027 | 6,684 | 6,343 (1.9Γ) |
| 24h change | β² 10.3% | β² 2.5% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 2.3B | 264.8M | 2B (8.5Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 858K | 412.6K | 445.4K (2.1Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 1.2M | 2.1M (2.7Γ) |
| Favorites | 2.6M | 5.5M | 3M (2.2Γ) |
| Rating | 88.1% | 96.5% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #149 | #298 | of 4,576 |
| Trending score | 48.0 | 56.5 | β |
| Created | Aug 9, 2019 | Aug 12, 2021 | β |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 5 days for Muscle Legends, 4 for Build to Survive [TESTING].