Muscle Legends vs Build to Survive [TESTING]

Muscle Legends currently leads with 12,740 concurrent players against 6,589, a 1.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Muscle Legends at 13,027 concurrent players, versus 6,684. Lifetime, Muscle Legends has more visits (2.3B vs 264.8M). Full side-by-side history for Muscle Legends and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.

πŸ’ͺMuscle Legends
12,740
playing now
13,027 24h peak Β· 2.3B visits
VS
Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
6,589
playing now
6,684 24h peak Β· 264.8M visits

Player count history

Muscle LegendsBuild to Survive [TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Muscle Legends Build to Survive [TESTING]Difference
Playing now12,7406,5896,151 (1.9Γ—)
24h peak13,0276,6846,343 (1.9Γ—)
24h average11,0755,3175,758 (2.1Γ—)
7-day peak13,0276,6846,343 (1.9Γ—)
7-day average9,8974,6145,283 (2.1Γ—)
30-day peak13,0276,6846,343 (1.9Γ—)
All-time peak13,0276,6846,343 (1.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 10.3%β–² 2.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits2.3B264.8M2B (8.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)858K412.6K445.4K (2.1Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M1.2M2.1M (2.7Γ—)
Favorites2.6M5.5M3M (2.2Γ—)
Rating88.1%96.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#149#298of 4,576
Trending score48.056.5β€”
CreatedAug 9, 2019Aug 12, 2021β€”
GenreSimulationSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Muscle Legends, 4 for Build to Survive [TESTING].

Muscle Legends vs Build to Survive [TESTING] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals