Muscle Legends vs Jump To Steal Soccer Players
Jump To Steal Soccer Players currently leads with 27,138 concurrent players against 11,273, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump To Steal Soccer Players at 58,346 concurrent players, versus 13,517. Lifetime, Muscle Legends has more visits (2.3B vs 13M). Full side-by-side history for Muscle Legends and Jump To Steal Soccer Players is charted above.
💪Muscle Legends
11,273
playing now
13,517 24h peak · 2.3B visits
VS
⚽ Jump To Steal Soccer Players ⚽
27,138
playing now
58,346 24h peak · 13M visits
Player count history
Muscle LegendsJump To Steal Soccer Players
Head to head
| Metric | Muscle Legends | Jump To Steal Soccer Players | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 11,273 | 27,138 | 15,865 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 13,517 | 58,346 | 44,829 (4.3×) |
| 24h average | 11,422 | 27,775 | 16,353 (2.4×) |
| 7-day peak | 13,517 | 58,346 | 44,829 (4.3×) |
| 7-day average | 9,966 | 22,024 | 12,058 (2.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 13,517 | 58,346 | 44,829 (4.3×) |
| All-time peak | 13,517 | 58,346 | 44,829 (4.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 12.7% | ▲ 14.7% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 2.3B | 13M | 2.2B (174.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 951.9K | 2.7M | 1.8M (2.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.6M | 9.1M | 5.5M (2.5×) |
| Favorites | 2.6M | 483.3K | 2.1M (5.3×) |
| Rating | 88.1% | 87.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #146 | #59 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 59.1 | 115.9 | — |
| Created | Aug 9, 2019 | Jul 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Muscle Legends, 5 for Jump To Steal Soccer Players.