House Tycoon vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB
FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 761 concurrent players against 350, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 650. Momentum favours FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB: -16.3% week over week versus -22.2% for House Tycoon. Lifetime, House Tycoon has more visits (349.3M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for House Tycoon and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.
🏠 House Tycoon
350
playing now
545 24h peak · 349.3M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
761
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits
Player count history
House TycoonFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB
Head to head
| Metric | House Tycoon | FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 350 | 761 | 411 (2.2×) |
| 24h peak | 545 | 1,769 | 1,224 (3.2×) |
| 24h average | 392 | 1,256 | 864 (3.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 621 | 1,769 | 1,148 (2.8×) |
| 7-day average | 323 | 1,071 | 748 (3.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 621 | 1,769 | 1,148 (2.8×) |
| All-time peak | 650 | 1,769 | 1,119 (2.7×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.3% | ▲ 6.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 22.2% | ▼ 16.3% | — |
| Total visits | 349.3M | 7.4M | 341.9M (47.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 43.1K | 200.9K | 157.8K (4.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 265.2K | 1.1M | 870.7K (4.3×) |
| Favorites | 6.3M | 801.8K | 5.5M (7.8×) |
| Rating | 92.3% | 81.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,526 | #1,642 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 51.6 | 52.4 | — |
| Created | Jul 31, 2019 | Apr 24, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for House Tycoon, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.