[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander currently leads with 6,043 concurrent players against 1,908, a 3.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander at 7,280 concurrent players, versus 3,228. Lifetime, [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo has more visits (180.5M vs 22.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo and [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander is charted above.

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo
1,908
playing now
2,256 24h peak · 180.5M visits
VS
[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
6,043
playing now
7,280 24h peak · 22.8M visits

Player count history

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

Head to head

Metric [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderDifference
Playing now1,9086,0434,135 (3.2×)
24h peak2,2567,2805,024 (3.2×)
24h average1,8825,4903,608 (2.9×)
7-day peak3,1987,2804,082 (2.3×)
7-day average1,3234,9993,676 (3.8×)
30-day peak3,1987,2804,082 (2.3×)
All-time peak3,2287,2804,052 (2.3×)
24h change 2.0% 13.6%
7d change
Total visits180.5M22.8M157.7M (7.9×)
Visits (24h)132.1K578.9K446.8K (4.4×)
Visits (7d)429.6K2.4M1.9M (5.5×)
Favorites726.7K86.3K640.3K (8.4×)
Rating89.8%95.1%
Global rank (players)#935#313of 4,743
Trending score135.936.5
CreatedJun 20, 2019Jun 10, 2026
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo, 5 for [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander.

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals