[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo vs ZOO or OOF 2

ZOO or OOF 2 currently leads with 2,731 concurrent players against 1,146, a 2.4Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ZOO or OOF 2 at 3,508 concurrent players, versus 3,228. Momentum favours ZOO or OOF 2: +117.8% week over week versus +72.2% for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo. Lifetime, [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo has more visits (181.1M vs 2.7M). Full side-by-side history for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo and ZOO or OOF 2 is charted above.

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo
1,146
playing now
1,683 24h peak Β· 181.1M visits
VS
ZOO or OOF 2πŸ’₯
2,731
playing now
2,955 24h peak Β· 2.7M visits

Player count history

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: TokyoZOO or OOF 2

Head to head

Metric [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo ZOO or OOF 2Difference
Playing now1,1462,7311,585 (2.4Γ—)
24h peak1,6832,9551,272 (1.8Γ—)
24h average1,2682,3441,076 (1.8Γ—)
7-day peak2,3133,3521,039
7-day average1,6052,141536
30-day peak2,3133,3521,039
All-time peak3,2283,508280
24h changeβ–Ό 10.6%β–² 5.2%β€”
7d changeβ–² 72.2%β–² 117.8%β€”
Total visits181.1M2.7M178.3M (66.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)99.1K212.1K113K (2.1Γ—)
Visits (7d)839.7K1.7M858.3K (2.0Γ—)
Favorites727.9K9.6K718.3K (76.1Γ—)
Rating89.8%83.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,153#556of 7,126
Trending score-64.231.6β€”
CreatedJun 20, 2019Jul 27, 2026β€”
GenreSports & RacingParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo, 9 for ZOO or OOF 2.

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo vs ZOO or OOF 2 β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals