[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo vs [FPS] Flick

[FPS] Flick currently leads with 3,694 concurrent players against 1,306, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FPS] Flick at 4,793 concurrent players, versus 3,228. Momentum favours [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo: +7.8% week over week versus +1.9% for [FPS] Flick. Lifetime, [FPS] Flick has more visits (467.6M vs 181.3M). Full side-by-side history for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo and [FPS] Flick is charted above.

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo
1,306
playing now
1,679 24h peak · 181.3M visits
VS
[FPS] Flick
3,694
playing now
4,186 24h peak · 467.6M visits

Player count history

[UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo[FPS] Flick

Head to head

Metric [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo [FPS] FlickDifference
Playing now1,3063,6942,388 (2.8×)
24h peak1,6794,1862,507 (2.5×)
24h average1,2873,1661,879 (2.5×)
7-day peak2,1184,3902,272 (2.1×)
7-day average1,4193,0011,582 (2.1×)
30-day peak2,1184,3902,272 (2.1×)
All-time peak3,2284,7931,565
24h change 5.1% 8.5%
7d change 7.8% 1.9%
Total visits181.3M467.6M286.3M (2.6×)
Visits (24h)93.3K467.9K374.6K (5.0×)
Visits (7d)752.9K3.5M2.7M (4.6×)
Favorites728.5K377.3K351.2K (1.9×)
Rating89.8%92.9%
Global rank (players)#1,227#518of 8,197
Trending score-28.519.1
CreatedJun 20, 2019Sep 25, 2025
GenreSports & RacingShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [UPDATE!] Midnight Racing: Tokyo, 13 for [FPS] Flick.