Warfare Tycoon vs Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] currently leads with 1,873 concurrent players against 1,113, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] at 2,386 concurrent players, versus 1,113. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +13.5% week over week versus +7.8% for Warfare Tycoon. Lifetime, Warfare Tycoon has more visits (137.9M vs 98.2M). Full side-by-side history for Warfare Tycoon and Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] is charted above.
Warfare Tycoon
1,113
playing now
1,113 24h peak · 137.9M visits
VS
Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,873
playing now
2,123 24h peak · 98.2M visits
Player count history
Warfare TycoonBuild a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
Head to head
| Metric | Warfare Tycoon | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,113 | 1,873 | 760 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,113 | 2,123 | 1,010 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 868 | 1,782 | 914 (2.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,113 | 2,378 | 1,265 (2.1×) |
| 7-day average | 708 | 1,678 | 970 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,113 | 2,378 | 1,265 (2.1×) |
| All-time peak | 1,113 | 2,386 | 1,273 (2.1×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 23.1% | ▲ 0.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 7.8% | ▲ 13.5% | — |
| Total visits | 137.9M | 98.2M | 39.7M |
| Visits (24h) | 54.6K | 132.6K | 78K (2.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 359.4K | 933.6K | 574.2K (2.6×) |
| Favorites | 491.4K | 1.8M | 1.3M (3.6×) |
| Rating | 84.8% | 91.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,463 | #1,013 | of 8,195 |
| Trending score | 64.3 | 19.9 | — |
| Created | Jul 26, 2010 | Jun 30, 2017 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Warfare Tycoon, 12 for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS].