Warfare Tycoon vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,810 concurrent players against 995, a 4.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 1,256. Momentum favours Warfare Tycoon: +11.2% week over week versus -4.9% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 137.9M). Full side-by-side history for Warfare Tycoon and Build to Survive is charted above.
Warfare Tycoon
995
playing now
1,256 24h peak · 137.9M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,810
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
Player count history
Warfare TycoonBuild to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | Warfare Tycoon | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 995 | 4,810 | 3,815 (4.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,256 | 6,972 | 5,716 (5.6×) |
| 24h average | 966 | 5,670 | 4,704 (5.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,256 | 7,086 | 5,830 (5.6×) |
| 7-day average | 736 | 5,057 | 4,321 (6.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,256 | 7,086 | 5,830 (5.6×) |
| All-time peak | 1,256 | 7,252 | 5,996 (5.8×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 31.6% | ▲ 3.3% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 11.2% | ▼ 4.9% | — |
| Total visits | 137.9M | 409.6M | 271.7M (3.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 57.1K | 546K | 488.9K (9.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 360.9K | 3.5M | 3.1M (9.6×) |
| Favorites | 491.4K | 10.9M | 10.4M (22.3×) |
| Rating | 84.8% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,405 | #346 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 90.3 | 45.3 | — |
| Created | Jul 26, 2010 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Warfare Tycoon, 12 for Build to Survive.