Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay vs Ground Crew Simulator

Ground Crew Simulator currently leads with 288 concurrent players against 268. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay at 434 concurrent players, versus 402. Momentum favours Ground Crew Simulator: +12.5% week over week versus +1.4% for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay. Lifetime, Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay has more visits (83.5M vs 23.5M). Full side-by-side history for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay and Ground Crew Simulator is charted above.

❄️🗻Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay
268
playing now
395 24h peak · 83.5M visits
VS
Ground Crew Simulator
288
playing now
336 24h peak · 23.5M visits

Player count history

Mt. Everest Climbing RoleplayGround Crew Simulator

Head to head

Metric Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay Ground Crew SimulatorDifference
Playing now26828820
24h peak39533659
24h average26123427
7-day peak3954027
7-day average2242168
30-day peak3954027
All-time peak43440232
24h change 11.5% 23.8%
7d change 1.4% 12.5%
Total visits83.5M23.5M60.1M (3.6×)
Visits (24h)19.2K34.7K15.5K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)120.8K239.5K118.7K (2.0×)
Favorites504.2K88K416.2K (5.7×)
Rating75.6%85.6%
Global rank (players)#2,660#2,623of 8,017
Trending score36.117.8
CreatedMay 4, 2019Dec 11, 2024
GenreAdventureSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay, 13 for Ground Crew Simulator.