Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay vs Mini Cities [Classic]

Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay currently leads with 145 concurrent players against 30, a 4.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay at 434 concurrent players, versus 175. Lifetime, Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay has more visits (83.5M vs 41.2M). Full side-by-side history for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay and Mini Cities [Classic] is charted above.

❄️🗻Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay
145
playing now
336 24h peak · 83.5M visits
VS
Mini Cities [Classic]
30
playing now
165 24h peak · 41.2M visits

Player count history

Mt. Everest Climbing RoleplayMini Cities [Classic]

Head to head

Metric Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay Mini Cities [Classic]Difference
Playing now14530115 (4.8×)
24h peak336165171 (2.0×)
24h average19590105 (2.2×)
7-day peak367171196 (2.1×)
7-day average21191120 (2.3×)
30-day peak367171196 (2.1×)
All-time peak434175259 (2.5×)
24h change 19.8% 4.7%
7d change 5.8%
Total visits83.5M41.2M42.3M (2.0×)
Visits (24h)17.3K9K8.4K (1.9×)
Visits (7d)119.7K55.3K64.4K (2.2×)
Favorites504.2K186.1K318.1K (2.7×)
Rating75.6%88.1%
Global rank (players)#3,305#4,564of 8,339
Trending score-15.7-1.7
CreatedMay 4, 2019Oct 20, 2020
GenreAdventureSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay, 8 for Mini Cities [Classic].