Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay vs [ATC] Air Traffic Simulator

[ATC] Air Traffic Simulator currently leads with 278 concurrent players against 216. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay at 434 concurrent players, versus 398. Lifetime, Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay has more visits (83.4M vs 11.2M). Full side-by-side history for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay and [ATC] Air Traffic Simulator is charted above.

β„οΈπŸ—»Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay
216
playing now
434 24h peak Β· 83.4M visits
VS
[ATC] Air Traffic Simulator
278
playing now
339 24h peak Β· 11.2M visits

Player count history

Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay[ATC] Air Traffic Simulator

Head to head

Metric Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay [ATC] Air Traffic SimulatorDifference
Playing now21627862
24h peak43433995
24h average2382468
7-day peak43439836
7-day average21924425
30-day peak43439836
All-time peak43439836
24h changeβ–² 13.9%β–² 16.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits83.4M11.2M72.2M (7.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)17.6K32.9K15.3K (1.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)56.7K109K52.3K (1.9Γ—)
Favorites503.9K83.7K420.2K (6.0Γ—)
Rating75.6%92.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,421#2,196of 4,278
Trending score18.61.8β€”
CreatedMay 4, 2019Nov 4, 2025β€”
GenreAdventureSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay, 4 for [ATC] Air Traffic Simulator.

Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay vs [ATC] Air Traffic Simulator β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals