Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5 vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 3,160 concurrent players against 689, a 4.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 1,052. Momentum favours Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5: -10.2% week over week versus -15.6% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (618.5M vs 18M). Full side-by-side history for Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5 and Eat the World is charted above.

[🌷] Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5
689
playing now
792 24h peak · 18M visits
VS
Eat the World
3,160
playing now
3,880 24h peak · 618.5M visits

Player count history

Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5Eat the World

Head to head

Metric Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5 Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now6893,1602,471 (4.6×)
24h peak7923,8803,088 (4.9×)
24h average5303,3352,805 (6.3×)
7-day peak1,0304,1013,071 (4.0×)
7-day average5183,2742,756 (6.3×)
30-day peak1,0304,2943,264 (4.2×)
All-time peak1,0525,2614,209 (5.0×)
24h change 23.0% 6.0%
7d change 10.2% 15.6%
Total visits18M618.5M600.5M (34.3×)
Visits (24h)43K320.1K277K (7.4×)
Visits (7d)353.7K2.3M1.9M (6.5×)
Favorites19K27.9M27.9M (1465.7×)
Rating94.2%94.7%
Global rank (players)#1,937#661of 8,284
Trending score6.06.5
CreatedApr 23, 2019Feb 22, 2024
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5, 13 for Eat the World.