Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5 vs FNAF: Eternal Nights

FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,825 concurrent players against 327, a 17.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 1,052. Momentum favours FNAF: Eternal Nights: -9.4% week over week versus -12.0% for Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (318.2M vs 18M). Full side-by-side history for Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5 and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.

[🌷] Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5
327
playing now
792 24h peak · 18M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
5,825
playing now
6,106 24h peak · 318.2M visits

Player count history

Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5FNAF: Eternal Nights

Head to head

Metric Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5 FNAF: Eternal NightsDifference
Playing now3275,8255,498 (17.8×)
24h peak7926,1065,314 (7.7×)
24h average4764,7464,270 (10.0×)
7-day peak1,0306,4005,370 (6.2×)
7-day average5073,9343,427 (7.8×)
30-day peak1,0306,4005,370 (6.2×)
All-time peak1,0527,0025,950 (6.7×)
24h change 11.2% 20.8%
7d change 12.0% 9.4%
Total visits18M318.2M300.2M (17.6×)
Visits (24h)45.5K542K496.5K (11.9×)
Visits (7d)355.7K3.8M3.4M (10.6×)
Favorites19K849.7K830.7K (44.7×)
Rating94.2%94.4%
Global rank (players)#2,487#292of 8,283
Trending score-15.775.4
CreatedApr 23, 2019Oct 27, 2022
GenreSports & RacingSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Rhythmic Gymnastics Center V5, 13 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.