Forgotten Worlds vs Find the Chameleons [280]

Find the Chameleons [280] currently leads with 2,818 concurrent players against 1,142, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Find the Chameleons [280] at 3,341 concurrent players, versus 2,613. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (596.8M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and Find the Chameleons [280] is charted above.

Forgotten Worlds
1,142
playing now
2,613 24h peak · 596.8M visits
VS
Find the Chameleons [280]
2,818
playing now
3,134 24h peak · 6.5M visits

Player count history

Forgotten WorldsFind the Chameleons [280]

Head to head

Metric Forgotten Worlds Find the Chameleons [280]Difference
Playing now1,1422,8181,676 (2.5×)
24h peak2,6133,134521
24h average1,7052,464759
7-day peak2,6133,275662
7-day average1,7251,65075
30-day peak2,6133,275662
All-time peak2,6133,341728
24h change 3.1% 46.8%
7d change
Total visits596.8M6.5M590.3M (91.5×)
Visits (24h)175.3K274.8K99.4K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)305K637.3K332.3K (2.1×)
Favorites1.3M582.1K706.8K (2.2×)
Rating91.7%94.0%
Global rank (players)#1,149#532of 4,380
Trending score-3.7164.9
CreatedMar 17, 2019Jul 16, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Forgotten Worlds, 4 for Find the Chameleons [280].

Forgotten Worlds vs Find the Chameleons [280] — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals