Forgotten Worlds vs Eat Blobs Simulator

Forgotten Worlds currently leads with 2,069 concurrent players against 598, a 3.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Forgotten Worlds at 2,613 concurrent players, versus 1,487. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (596.8M vs 240.1M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and Eat Blobs Simulator is charted above.

Forgotten Worlds
2,069
playing now
2,613 24h peak · 596.8M visits
VS
Eat Blobs Simulator
598
playing now
1,487 24h peak · 240.1M visits

Player count history

Forgotten WorldsEat Blobs Simulator

Head to head

Metric Forgotten Worlds Eat Blobs SimulatorDifference
Playing now2,0695981,471 (3.5×)
24h peak2,6131,4871,126 (1.8×)
24h average2,0708381,232 (2.5×)
7-day peak2,6131,4871,126 (1.8×)
7-day average2,0407531,287 (2.7×)
30-day peak2,6131,4871,126 (1.8×)
All-time peak2,6131,4871,126 (1.8×)
24h change 5.3% 17.4%
7d change
Total visits596.8M240.1M356.6M (2.5×)
Visits (24h)169K114.1K54.9K
Visits (7d)276.1K356.8K80.6K
Favorites1.3M1.3M19K
Rating91.7%77.3%
Global rank (players)#796#1,584of 4,381
Trending score4.832.0
CreatedMar 17, 2019Dec 8, 2021
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Forgotten Worlds, 5 for Eat Blobs Simulator.

Forgotten Worlds vs Eat Blobs Simulator — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals