Forgotten Worlds vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,846 concurrent players against 2,680, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,996. Momentum favours Forgotten Worlds: +26.7% week over week versus +10.0% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (598.5M vs 268.5M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Forgotten Worlds
2,680
playing now
4,996 24h peak · 598.5M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,846
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.5M visits
Player count history
Forgotten WorldsBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Forgotten Worlds | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,680 | 4,846 | 2,166 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 4,996 | 6,297 | 1,301 |
| 24h average | 2,948 | 4,885 | 1,937 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,996 | 7,557 | 2,561 (1.5×) |
| 7-day average | 2,429 | 5,081 | 2,652 (2.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,996 | 7,557 | 2,561 (1.5×) |
| All-time peak | 4,996 | 7,729 | 2,733 (1.5×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 6.0% | ▼ 4.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 26.7% | ▲ 10.0% | — |
| Total visits | 598.5M | 268.5M | 330M (2.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 280.6K | 433.9K | 153.2K (1.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.5M | 3.2M | 1.7M (2.1×) |
| Favorites | 1.3M | 5.6M | 4.3M (4.3×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #646 | #346 | of 8,017 |
| Trending score | 73.4 | -14.2 | — |
| Created | Mar 17, 2019 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Forgotten Worlds, 12 for Build to Survive [TESTING].