Forgotten Worlds vs [UPD] Get Fat to Splash
Forgotten Worlds currently leads with 2,790 concurrent players against 443, a 6.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Forgotten Worlds at 4,996 concurrent players, versus 1,270. Momentum favours Forgotten Worlds: +26.1% week over week versus -10.4% for [UPD] Get Fat to Splash. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (598.7M vs 37.1M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and [UPD] Get Fat to Splash is charted above.
Forgotten Worlds
2,790
playing now
4,190 24h peak · 598.7M visits
VS
[UPD] Get Fat to Splash💦
443
playing now
991 24h peak · 37.1M visits
Player count history
Forgotten Worlds[UPD] Get Fat to Splash
Head to head
| Metric | Forgotten Worlds | [UPD] Get Fat to Splash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,790 | 443 | 2,347 (6.3×) |
| 24h peak | 4,190 | 991 | 3,199 (4.2×) |
| 24h average | 3,062 | 433 | 2,629 (7.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 4,996 | 1,212 | 3,784 (4.1×) |
| 7-day average | 2,553 | 457 | 2,096 (5.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,996 | 1,212 | 3,784 (4.1×) |
| All-time peak | 4,996 | 1,270 | 3,726 (3.9×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 11.9% | ▼ 49.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 26.1% | ▼ 10.4% | — |
| Total visits | 598.7M | 37.1M | 561.6M (16.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 255.4K | 47.8K | 207.6K (5.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 385.8K | 1.2M (4.1×) |
| Favorites | 1.3M | 1.9M | 585.4K |
| Rating | 91.7% | 95.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #575 | #2,138 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 68.9 | -13.2 | — |
| Created | Mar 17, 2019 | Feb 25, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Forgotten Worlds, 12 for [UPD] Get Fat to Splash.