Forgotten Worlds vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 4,935 concurrent players against 2,803, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 4,996. Momentum favours Forgotten Worlds: +26.2% week over week versus -10.9% for FNAF: Eternal Nights. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (598.7M vs 318.3M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
Forgotten Worlds
2,803
playing now
4,190 24h peak · 598.7M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
4,935
playing now
6,106 24h peak · 318.3M visits
Player count history
Forgotten WorldsFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Forgotten Worlds | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,803 | 4,935 | 2,132 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 4,190 | 6,106 | 1,916 |
| 24h average | 3,077 | 4,549 | 1,472 |
| 7-day peak | 4,996 | 6,106 | 1,110 |
| 7-day average | 2,556 | 3,886 | 1,330 (1.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,996 | 6,106 | 1,110 |
| All-time peak | 4,996 | 7,002 | 2,006 |
| 24h change | ▼ 11.4% | ▲ 14.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 26.2% | ▼ 10.9% | — |
| Total visits | 598.7M | 318.3M | 280.5M (1.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 253.7K | 524.9K | 271.2K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 3.7M | 2.2M (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 1.3M | 849.9K | 446.1K (1.5×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #565 | #300 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 70.4 | 62.0 | — |
| Created | Mar 17, 2019 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Forgotten Worlds, 13 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.