Forgotten Worlds vs [ MUSEUM] Chameleon

[ MUSEUM] Chameleon currently leads with 4,545 concurrent players against 2,227, a 2.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [ MUSEUM] Chameleon at 8,349 concurrent players, versus 2,842. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (596.9M vs 70.3M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and [ MUSEUM] Chameleon is charted above.

Forgotten Worlds
2,227
playing now
2,842 24h peak Β· 596.9M visits
VS
[πŸ–ΌοΈ MUSEUM] Chameleon
4,545
playing now
6,012 24h peak Β· 70.3M visits

Player count history

Forgotten Worlds[ MUSEUM] Chameleon

Head to head

Metric Forgotten Worlds [ MUSEUM] ChameleonDifference
Playing now2,2274,5452,318 (2.0Γ—)
24h peak2,8426,0123,170 (2.1Γ—)
24h average2,0054,8332,828 (2.4Γ—)
7-day peak2,8428,3495,507 (2.9Γ—)
7-day average1,9526,0064,054 (3.1Γ—)
30-day peak2,8428,3495,507 (2.9Γ—)
All-time peak2,8428,3495,507 (2.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 7.7%β–Ό 8.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits596.9M70.3M526.7M (8.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)175.5K718K542.5K (4.1Γ—)
Visits (7d)453.8K3.5M3M (7.7Γ—)
Favorites1.3M189.4K1.1M (6.8Γ—)
Rating91.7%75.6%β€”
Global rank (players)#724#370of 4,798
Trending score8.9-71.7β€”
CreatedMar 17, 2019Jun 5, 2026β€”
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Forgotten Worlds, 5 for [ MUSEUM] Chameleon.

Forgotten Worlds vs [ MUSEUM] Chameleon β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals