Da Hood vs Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

Da Hood currently leads with 3,462 concurrent players against 416, a 8.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Da Hood at 4,175 concurrent players, versus 1,307. Momentum favours Da Hood: -9.9% week over week versus -47.6% for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]. Lifetime, Da Hood has more visits (2.9B vs 3.3M). Full side-by-side history for Da Hood and Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING] is charted above.

Da Hood
3,462
playing now
3,891 24h peak · 2.9B visits
VS
Virtual Football [🔓 OPEN TESTING]
416
playing now
475 24h peak · 3.3M visits

Player count history

Da HoodVirtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Da Hood Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING]Difference
Playing now3,4624163,046 (8.3×)
24h peak3,8914753,416 (8.2×)
24h average3,1603422,818 (9.2×)
7-day peak3,8917563,135 (5.1×)
7-day average2,6713702,301 (7.2×)
30-day peak3,9541,3072,647 (3.0×)
All-time peak4,1751,3072,868 (3.2×)
24h change 14.5% 1.8%
7d change 9.9% 47.6%
Total visits2.9B3.3M2.9B (887.4×)
Visits (24h)385.3K66.4K318.9K (5.8×)
Visits (7d)2.6M588.2K2M (4.4×)
Favorites3M7K3M (427.7×)
Rating70.5%81.3%
Global rank (players)#462#2,196of 8,283
Trending score63.5-18.1
CreatedJan 27, 2019Jan 24, 2026
GenreActionSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Da Hood, 13 for Virtual Football [ OPEN TESTING].