Reminiscence Zombies vs [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape currently leads with 3,318 concurrent players against 1,385, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape at 4,156 concurrent players, versus 2,036. Momentum favours [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape: +8.0% week over week versus -25.3% for Reminiscence Zombies. Lifetime, [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape has more visits (43.4M vs 29.7M). Full side-by-side history for Reminiscence Zombies and [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape is charted above.
Reminiscence Zombies
1,385
playing now
1,445 24h peak · 29.7M visits
VS
[2X🍗] Get Fat to Break Tape 🍗
3,318
playing now
4,156 24h peak · 43.4M visits
Player count history
Reminiscence Zombies[2X] Get Fat to Break Tape
Head to head
| Metric | Reminiscence Zombies | [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,385 | 3,318 | 1,933 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 1,445 | 4,156 | 2,711 (2.9×) |
| 24h average | 1,112 | 3,499 | 2,387 (3.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,997 | 4,156 | 2,159 (2.1×) |
| 7-day average | 1,044 | 2,394 | 1,350 (2.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,997 | 4,156 | 2,159 (2.1×) |
| All-time peak | 2,036 | 4,156 | 2,120 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 29.6% | ▲ 47.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 25.3% | ▲ 8.0% | — |
| Total visits | 29.7M | 43.4M | 13.7M |
| Visits (24h) | 66.2K | 408.8K | 342.6K (6.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 541.9K | 2M | 1.4M (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 221K | 2.4M | 2.2M (10.8×) |
| Rating | 91.8% | 98.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,159 | #542 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 19.4 | 161.9 | — |
| Created | Jan 23, 2019 | May 8, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Reminiscence Zombies, 13 for [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape.