Reminiscence Zombies vs Build to Survive [TESTING]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 6,159 concurrent players against 1,282, a 4.8Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,813 concurrent players, versus 2,036. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (265M vs 29.1M). Full side-by-side history for Reminiscence Zombies and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.

Reminiscence Zombies
1,282
playing now
2,036 24h peak Β· 29.1M visits
VS
Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
6,159
playing now
6,813 24h peak Β· 265M visits

Player count history

Reminiscence ZombiesBuild to Survive [TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Reminiscence Zombies Build to Survive [TESTING]Difference
Playing now1,2826,1594,877 (4.8Γ—)
24h peak2,0366,8134,777 (3.3Γ—)
24h average1,1925,3514,159 (4.5Γ—)
7-day peak2,0366,8134,777 (3.3Γ—)
7-day average1,3724,6313,259 (3.4Γ—)
30-day peak2,0366,8134,777 (3.3Γ—)
All-time peak2,0366,8134,777 (3.3Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 0.3%β–² 4.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits29.1M265M235.9M (9.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)87.6K447.5K359.9K (5.1Γ—)
Visits (7d)363.5K1.4M1M (3.8Γ—)
Favorites218.2K5.5M5.3M (25.4Γ—)
Rating91.8%96.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,227#309of 4,743
Trending score-39.757.7β€”
CreatedJan 23, 2019Aug 12, 2021β€”
GenreShooterSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Reminiscence Zombies, 4 for Build to Survive [TESTING].

Reminiscence Zombies vs Build to Survive [TESTING] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals