3008 [2.74] vs Jump for Cases

3008 [2.74] currently leads with 14,316 concurrent players against 1,330, a 10.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,045 concurrent players, versus 8,801. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 3M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and Jump for Cases is charted above.

3008 [2.74]
14,316
playing now
17,977 24h peak · 3.3B visits
VS
Jump for Cases
1,330
playing now
5,816 24h peak · 3M visits

Player count history

3008 [2.74]Jump for Cases

Head to head

Metric 3008 [2.74] Jump for CasesDifference
Playing now14,3161,33012,986 (10.8×)
24h peak17,9775,81612,161 (3.1×)
24h average14,3781,40512,973 (10.2×)
7-day peak19,0455,81613,229 (3.3×)
7-day average13,2761,44811,828 (9.2×)
30-day peak19,0455,81613,229 (3.3×)
All-time peak19,0458,80110,244 (2.2×)
24h change 5.8% 41.3%
7d change
Total visits3.3B3M3.3B (1075.8×)
Visits (24h)1M137K912.9K (7.7×)
Visits (7d)4.3M571.4K3.7M (7.5×)
Favorites5.7M94.7K5.6M (60.6×)
Rating91.7%97.6%
Global rank (players)#122#1,154of 5,050
Trending score34.5-9.2
CreatedJan 20, 2019May 14, 2026
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for 3008 [2.74], 5 for Jump for Cases.

3008 [2.74] vs Jump for Cases — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals