3008 [2.74] vs [FPS] One Tap

3008 [2.74] currently leads with 15,128 concurrent players against 14,732. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FPS] One Tap at 19,629 concurrent players, versus 19,045. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 424M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and [FPS] One Tap is charted above.

3008 [2.74]
15,128
playing now
17,977 24h peak · 3.3B visits
VS
[FPS] One Tap
14,732
playing now
19,629 24h peak · 424M visits

Player count history

3008 [2.74][FPS] One Tap

Head to head

Metric 3008 [2.74] [FPS] One TapDifference
Playing now15,12814,732396
24h peak17,97719,6291,652
24h average15,62215,349273
7-day peak19,04519,629584
7-day average13,49312,923570
30-day peak19,04519,629584
All-time peak19,04519,629584
24h change 3.8% 15.1%
7d change
Total visits3.3B424M2.8B (7.7×)
Visits (24h)1M2.3M1.3M (2.3×)
Visits (7d)4.1M8.9M4.8M (2.2×)
Favorites5.7M474.8K5.3M (12.1×)
Rating91.7%88.0%
Global rank (players)#108#109of 4,743
Trending score66.078.4
CreatedJan 20, 2019Dec 4, 2025
GenreSurvivalShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for 3008 [2.74], 5 for [FPS] One Tap.

3008 [2.74] vs [FPS] One Tap — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals