3008 [2.74] vs [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape

3008 [2.74] currently leads with 12,151 concurrent players against 2,405, a 5.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,045 concurrent players, versus 3,857. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 41.4M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape is charted above.

3008 [2.74]
12,151
playing now
17,977 24h peak Β· 3.3B visits
VS
[2XπŸ—] Get Fat to Break Tape πŸ—
2,405
playing now
3,368 24h peak Β· 41.4M visits

Player count history

3008 [2.74][2X] Get Fat to Break Tape

Head to head

Metric 3008 [2.74] [2X] Get Fat to Break TapeDifference
Playing now12,1512,4059,746 (5.1Γ—)
24h peak17,9773,36814,609 (5.3Γ—)
24h average14,5742,04812,526 (7.1Γ—)
7-day peak19,0453,85715,188 (4.9Γ—)
7-day average13,3162,22411,092 (6.0Γ—)
30-day peak19,0453,85715,188 (4.9Γ—)
All-time peak19,0453,85715,188 (4.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 4.1%β–Ό 12.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits3.3B41.4M3.2B (79.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)1M219.1K811.4K (4.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)4.2M1.1M3.1M (3.8Γ—)
Favorites5.7M2.3M3.5M (2.5Γ—)
Rating91.7%98.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#119#689of 4,743
Trending score39.3-25.9β€”
CreatedJan 20, 2019May 8, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for 3008 [2.74], 5 for [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape.

3008 [2.74] vs [2X] Get Fat to Break Tape β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals