3008 [2.74] vs Animal Simulator

3008 [2.74] currently leads with 14,960 concurrent players against 4,163, a 3.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,045 concurrent players, versus 5,370. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 1.6B). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and Animal Simulator is charted above.

3008 [2.74]
14,960
playing now
17,977 24h peak · 3.3B visits
VS
Animal Simulator
4,163
playing now
5,370 24h peak · 1.6B visits

Player count history

3008 [2.74]Animal Simulator

Head to head

Metric 3008 [2.74] Animal SimulatorDifference
Playing now14,9604,16310,797 (3.6×)
24h peak17,9775,37012,607 (3.3×)
24h average15,6224,30511,317 (3.6×)
7-day peak19,0455,37013,675 (3.5×)
7-day average13,4933,6879,806 (3.7×)
30-day peak19,0455,37013,675 (3.5×)
All-time peak19,0455,37013,675 (3.5×)
24h change 3.8% 7.1%
7d change
Total visits3.3B1.6B1.7B (2.1×)
Visits (24h)1M342.2K672.2K (3.0×)
Visits (7d)4.1M1.3M2.7M (3.0×)
Favorites5.7M1.8M3.9M (3.2×)
Rating91.7%83.6%
Global rank (players)#108#445of 4,743
Trending score66.060.5
CreatedJan 20, 2019Sep 20, 2020
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for 3008 [2.74], 5 for Animal Simulator.

3008 [2.74] vs Animal Simulator — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals