3008 [2.74] vs [UPD] Cut a Gem
3008 [2.74] currently leads with 17,377 concurrent players against 1,954, a 8.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,045 concurrent players, versus 4,114. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 10.1M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and [UPD] Cut a Gem is charted above.
3008 [2.74]
17,377
playing now
17,977 24h peak · 3.3B visits
VS
[🔥UPD] Cut a Gem
1,954
playing now
4,114 24h peak · 10.1M visits
Player count history
3008 [2.74][UPD] Cut a Gem
Head to head
| Metric | 3008 [2.74] | [UPD] Cut a Gem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 17,377 | 1,954 | 15,423 (8.9×) |
| 24h peak | 17,977 | 4,114 | 13,863 (4.4×) |
| 24h average | 16,278 | 1,778 | 14,500 (9.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 19,045 | 4,114 | 14,931 (4.6×) |
| 7-day average | 13,597 | 1,552 | 12,045 (8.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 19,045 | 4,114 | 14,931 (4.6×) |
| All-time peak | 19,045 | 4,114 | 14,931 (4.6×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 3.6% | ▲ 16.0% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 3.3B | 10.1M | 3.3B (325.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 1.1M | 171.1K | 900.2K (6.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 4.6M | 710.8K | 3.8M (6.4×) |
| Favorites | 5.7M | 345K | 5.4M (16.6×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 97.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #85 | #796 | of 5,152 |
| Trending score | 82.9 | 46.6 | — |
| Created | Jan 20, 2019 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for 3008 [2.74], 6 for [UPD] Cut a Gem.