[BETA] Arena Football vs Tower Battles: Battlefront

Tower Battles: Battlefront currently leads with 92 concurrent players against 70. On all-time peak the record belongs to [BETA] Arena Football at 103 concurrent players, versus 103. Momentum favours [BETA] Arena Football: +17.6% week over week versus -9.6% for Tower Battles: Battlefront. Lifetime, Tower Battles: Battlefront has more visits (43M vs 7.6M). Full side-by-side history for [BETA] Arena Football and Tower Battles: Battlefront is charted above.

[BETA] Arena Football
70
playing now
103 24h peak · 7.6M visits
VS
Tower Battles: Battlefront
92
playing now
103 24h peak · 43M visits

Player count history

[BETA] Arena FootballTower Battles: Battlefront

Head to head

Metric [BETA] Arena Football Tower Battles: BattlefrontDifference
Playing now709222
24h peak103103tie
24h average58602
7-day peak103103tie
7-day average40477
30-day peak103103tie
All-time peak103103tie
24h change 65.7% 30.4%
7d change 17.6% 9.6%
Total visits7.6M43M35.5M (5.7×)
Visits (24h)8.3K6.7K1.6K
Visits (7d)47.6K42.6K5K
Favorites6.8K114.1K107.2K (16.7×)
Rating78.3%84.0%
Global rank (players)#4,159#3,969of 7,866
Trending score50.833.3
CreatedJan 5, 2019Nov 20, 2020
GenreSports & RacingAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for [BETA] Arena Football, 12 for Tower Battles: Battlefront.