[BETA] Arena Football vs Human Simulator

Human Simulator currently leads with 95 concurrent players against 74. On all-time peak the record belongs to [BETA] Arena Football at 102 concurrent players, versus 95. Momentum favours [BETA] Arena Football: +25.8% week over week versus +22.2% for Human Simulator. Lifetime, Human Simulator has more visits (31.3M vs 7.6M). Full side-by-side history for [BETA] Arena Football and Human Simulator is charted above.

[BETA] Arena Football
74
playing now
88 24h peak · 7.6M visits
VS
Human Simulator
95
playing now
94 24h peak · 31.3M visits

Player count history

[BETA] Arena FootballHuman Simulator

Head to head

Metric [BETA] Arena Football Human SimulatorDifference
Playing now749521
24h peak88946
24h average50555
7-day peak9494tie
7-day average39445
30-day peak9494tie
All-time peak102957
24h change 61.3% 27.9%
7d change 25.8% 22.2%
Total visits7.6M31.3M23.8M (4.1×)
Visits (24h)5.5K6.3K821
Visits (7d)46.9K41.8K5.1K
Favorites6.8K184.6K177.8K (27.1×)
Rating78.3%72.7%
Global rank (players)#3,927#3,811of 7,662
Trending score30.628.9
CreatedJan 5, 2019Nov 1, 2020
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for [BETA] Arena Football, 11 for Human Simulator.

[BETA] Arena Football vs Human Simulator — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals